这两天和中介联系，每联系一个，他们的接待员都会先问：作文多少分？看来作文在申请学校过程中占有一定的比重。
我在自己的作文帖子里具体也说了，列中文大纲非常的重要。但是虽说每个题目的大纲寥寥几句，但是思考过程很费力。我想，真正能把绝大部分的雅思作文列出大纲的同学，不会太多－－毕竟懒是我们的天性.....但是，有了网络这个好东西，咱们就该好好利用。因为雅思分数够用，绝对不想考第二次了。看到还有很多亲爱的同学们为了思考作文而绞尽脑汁，我深感同情 。所以，贡献出自己一点点力量，让大家在考雅思的道路上减少一些负担，就是我的初衷。
这些大纲有一点是参考一些前辈的想法，但是除了题目，剩下的都是我一个字一个字敲进去的。整个过程持续了将近15天。在今年3月份，南方冰冷的天气，自己一个人在宿舍哆哆嗦嗦的想这些应付题目的理由。有时候为了一个题目，要呆在屏幕前想2个小时，在网站找资料，翻书本。
因为基本都是自己写出来的，虽然已经尽可能的找合适的表达方法，但是难免出现一些问题，比如有的想法不够全面；ideas比较愚蠢、或是有比较大的争议。还要请大家多多包涵，提出建议！！！其实大家的反馈就是最大的支持。我会不断的修改，如果能让对写作比较头疼的朋友有一点提高，就心满意足了。
这些大纲总共近15000字（包括题目）。我已经把每个题目的出题时间都写在上面了，方便大家查找。但是由于一些问题，并不是完全按照时间来排版的。有的是倒序有的是正序。如果有朋友有时间，把这个东西修改一下，或是排下版，再发上来，真是感激不尽
字数太多，我把少量的内容先贴出来，让大家先看一下。如果有兴趣，就把word文档下来了去看，如果没兴趣，您就把这个页面关掉吧。
word不加密不设权限，大家随意修改。但是如果要转，请注明转自google。谢谢大家。
下面是部分内容：
2006/1/7
People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For:
1.The taxation of the government requires tax dollars from our pockets – living us with less disposable dollars to spend on self severing uses.
Against:
1.Taxation has four main purposes or effects: Revenue, Redistribution
2.The government will have no funds to spend on road, schools, hospitals and other infrastructure; this situation will definitely lead to the disorder of our society eventually.
3.The second has to do with the redistribution. Normally, this means transferring wealth from the richer sections of society to poorer sections. If no one pays tax, the rich keep getting richer and the poor poorer. Consequently, polarization will emerge. This situation will pose a threat to the stabilization of our society. The tax increases in the direct proportion to the amount you earn.
2006/1/21
At present, science has been developing at a high speed, but people still have a high opinion of artists. What can the arts tell us of the life that science cannot? (GRE 337)
Arts:
1.The true value of a civilized society is reflected in its artistic creations rather than in its scientific accomplishments.
2.The function and ultimate objectives of art is that art serves to lift the human spirit and to put us more in touch with our feelings, foibles, and fate – in short, with our own humanity.
3.Great paintings, music and literature are able to exert great influence on people by showing them representations of good or bad in society, and helping them know and understand society clearly.
4.An artist’s inspiration and creative works reflect the full history of human beings.
Science:
1. Without science, we are like an eagle without wings: we have dreams and ambitions, but cannot realize them.
20080223
是说很多国家因为运输业的发展而从世界各地进口食物，问你这样的发展有好处还是坏处。
For:
1.从其他国家进口食品。有利于本国食品工业的发展。随着运输业的发展，在国与国之间进行贸易运输的成本越来越低，进口的食品竞争力加大。促使本地的食品产业加快发展，以应对竞争。使整个行业受益。
2.有的食品本国无法生产。因为受各方面条件的制约，比如科技，气候等等，有些食品在有的国家无法生产出来，或是根本无法满足社会的需求。所以，为了应对这种矛盾resolve a contradiction，就必须进口食品。
3.随着食品贸易的增加，其他一系列产业也开始繁荣起来business boom。比如运输业，零售业等等。从而创造更多的工作机会，一定程度上帮助了社会的稳定。
Against：
1.进口食品就是对资源的浪费。从农业上来讲，几乎所有的社会秩序稳定的现代文明国家 public order and social stability，都可以生产出足够的食品来满足国内需求foodstuffs。进口粮食不但浪费运输资源，而且有带来国外疾病的危险。比如前些年韩国就进口了有疯牛病mad cow disease 的牛肉。然而，这些只是个别现象Isolated instances。我们不能因噎废食give up eating for fear of choking。
07.10.13
Some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experiences and personal qualities when they look for an employee. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
For:
1.竞争越来越激烈，雇主倾向于雇佣更有竞争力的人。Life experience and personal qualities是不可衡量的，不能做为雇佣的标准。但是academic qualifications 则可以
2.一般情况来说，有比较好的formal academic qualifications的人都接受过良好的大学教育，或是在业内是老手veteran。雇主一般不需要进行培训，他们就可以上岗。
3.Life experience and personal qualities虽然也重要，但是就做工作本身来说，有好的academic qualifications可以工作的更有效率
Positive：
1.这种趋势使更多的人愿意接受更高等的教育。教育是一个国家的基础，只有教育发展了，其它的产业才会发展
2.但是并不是说Life experience and personal qualities不重要。一些qualities比如，competition，cooperation，都狠重要。但是相对于日益job－oriented world来说，还是没有academic qualification 重要。
07.10.06（加考）
Today’s children are living under more pressure from the society than children in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
For:
1.社会竞争越来越激烈。现在的孩子要更加努力的学习，才能保证今后能够得到比较体面的工作。Raise their family with dignity.
2.城市的快速发展，使孩子没有playground玩耍，weekend最多的时间在家里写作业，看电视。
3.信息爆炸时代。孩子接受过多的信息，无法分辨是好是坏。
Against：
1.当然，现在的孩子比以前的孩子有更多的教育机会，更好的医疗设施，更高级的玩具，比以前的孩子生活的更舒适，健康。但是，孩子的天性就是玩耍，没有比接近自然更让孩子感到高兴的了。
2007.8.18
Should we invent a new language for people from different countries to use for the international communication? Do you think there are more benefits or more problems with it?
Against：
1.The world is more connected every day in every way. 但是发明一种新的语言来交流是一个不切实际的幻想。A dream amounts to fantasy.
2.Roma was not build in a day. 语言是经过长时间积累起来的。是一个文化遗产，a heritage that one group of people were continually fashioning out of their daily life experience.不可能在短时间内建立起来。在可预见的将来in the foreseeable future.
3.即使是发明出了一个语言，人们学不学还是个问题。Query whether people are tending to learn such a “new” language at all.
4.我们根本不需要去干涉interfere in the diversity of language, because the procession of evolution itself can produce the useful language it favors.
For:
1.虽然设计一个人类共同的语言非常的困难，但它确实鼓励一些把世界不同部分统一到一起的尝试。加快了全球化的发展。Granted that the invention of a new language can be hampered by numerous difficulties, their presence does encourage attempts to unify the world’s heterogeneous parts, thereby enhancing the development of globalization.
07.06.16
In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods. This is having a negative effect on both families and societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
1. I strongly disagree with the assertion that the fast food superseding the domestic food has a detrimental impact as far as both families and societies are concerned.
2.快餐为个人带来了前所未有的unprecedentedly方便。一，快餐节省了大量的做饭的时间。一般来说，traditional dishes are really time consuming. 在这个激烈竞争的时代，时间就是生命。二，增加了菜谱recipe的丰富程度。人们可以不出国门便可以吃到别国风味的快餐。让人们的生活更加的丰富。
3.快餐业在一定程度上带动drive了国家经济的发展。一，人们对快餐的需求日益增大，快餐业的发展booming，创造了很多就业机会。二，快餐业同时也帮助了其它产业的发展，比如养殖业livestock breeding, transportation. 三，快餐低廉的价格促使人们消费
4.虽然有人说fast food 是junk food，但是，人们当然不会天天吃这些东西，人们自己知道什么才是健康的生活方式，选择的权利在个人的手上。
2006/ 05 / 27
Some people think that the use of animal for experimentation is cruel. Other think it is good for the development of science. Discuss the two sides and give your opinion.
For：
1.为了科学的发展，这是是必须的。总不能把人当作实验动物吧？
2. 难道把牛杀了，供人们吃牛肉，就不是cruel了麽？
3.难道为了保护动物，致使很多药物研制不出来，造成成千上万的人残疾、死亡，饱受疾病的困扰，这就不残忍麽？
Against：
1. 动物也是creature。人们对动物做实验的确是不人道的Inhumane.我们应该对生命尊重，我们不希望自己回到stone age。
2.但是大自然的法则就是弱肉强食。According to Darwin’s “natural selection”, in which stronger species survive while weaker ones do not. In addition, we human beings are not exempt from this process. In order for the far ranging benefits of medical development to be achieved by individuals, societies, and the whole world, 动物实验是inevitable.
[ 本帖最后由 眠眠猪 于 2010-7-2 11:31 编辑 ]
![]() |
收藏